AI Policy:
The Standard of Intent

01. The Principle of Intent

In a landscape of infinite output, the only irreplaceable contribution is **Authorial Intent**. Intent is the fingerprint left on work: the specific reasons why something exists, the decisions made, and the context of its creation.

At klaweht.com, the standard is clear: **I underwrite every line.** Whether a post is handwritten or synthesized with Gemini, the intent is mine. If you find a line here, I have processed it, verified it, and taken responsibility for it.

02. Gemini as a Multiplier

I utilize **Gemini-3-flash** as a technical multiplier. It is an agentic partner used for synthesizing raw telemetry, organizing forensic logs, and drafting architectural structures.

However, LLMs can break the implicit contract between author and reader when they become middlemen for unverified output. To prevent this "erosion of trust," I adhere to the following hygiene:

• / No Phantom Sections: Every paragraph must have a reason for existing. If I can't explain "why is it this way?", it doesn't belong.
• / Forensic Verification: Technical claims and code are audited manually. I do not ship "vibed" output that I haven't processed.
• / Contextual Disclosure: Posts involving significant AI synthesis are marked with a disclosure, defining exactly how the model was used.

03. The Forensic Standard

Work presented without context is assumed to meet the Ideal Standard: fully underwritten, verified, and ready for serious engagement.

If a post is exploratory or relies heavily on unverified model output, it will be marked as such. The goal is transparency: you should never have to wonder if you are talking to a mind or a middleman.